Close category search window
 

Biased mutation operators for subgraph-selection problems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Raidl, G.R. ; Inst. of Comput. Graphics & Algorithms, Vienna Univ. of Technol., Austria ; Koller, G. ; Julstrom, B.A.

Many graph problems seek subgraphs of minimum weight that satisfy a set of constraints. Examples include the minimum spanning tree problem (MSTP), the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem (d-MSTP), and the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Low-weight edges predominate in optimum solutions to such problems, and the performance of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) is often improved by biasing variation operators to favor these edges. We investigate the impact of biased edge-exchange mutation. In a large-scale empirical investigation on Euclidean and uniform random instances, we describe the distributions of edges in optimum solutions of the MSTP, the d-MSTP, and the TSP in terms of the edges' weight-based ranks. We approximate these distributions by exponential functions and derive approximately optimal probabilities for selecting edges to be incorporated into candidate solutions during mutation. A theoretical analysis of the expected running time of a (1+1)-EA on nondegenerate instances of the MSTP shows that when using the derived probabilities for edge selection in mutation, the (1+1)-EA is asymptotically as fast as a classical implementation of Kruskal's minimum spanning tree algorithm. In experiments on the MSTP, d-MSTP, and the TSP, we compare the new edge-selection strategy to four alternative methods. The results of a (1+1)-EA on instances of the MSTP support the theory and indicate that the new strategy is superior to the other methods in practice. On instances of the d-MSTP, a more sophisticated EA with a larger population and unbiased recombination performs better with the new biased mutation than with alternate mutations. On the TSP, the advantages of weight-biased mutation are generally smaller, because the insertion of a specific new edge into a tour requires the insertion of a second dependent edge as well. Although we considered Euclidean and uniform random instances only, we conjecture that the same biasing toward low-weight edges also works well on other instance classes structured in different ways.

Published in:
Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:10 ,  Issue: 2 )

Date of Publication: April 2006

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.