By Topic

Optimal and suboptimal packet scheduling over correlated time varying flat fading channels

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Karmokar, A.K. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., British Columbia Univ., Canada ; Djonin, D.V. ; Bhargava, V.K.

We address the issue of optimal packet scheduling over correlated fading channels which trades off between minimization of three goals: average transmission power, average delay and average packet dropping probability. We show that the problem forms a weakly communicating Markov decision process and formulate the problem as both unconstrained and constrained problem. Relative value iteration (RVI) algorithm is used to find optimal deterministic policy for unconstrained problem, while optimal randomized policy for constrained problem is obtained using linear programming (LP) technique. Whereas with RVI only a finite number of scheduling policies can be obtained over the feasible delay region, LP can produce policies for all feasible delays with a fixed dropping probability and is computationally faster than the RVI. We show the structure of optimal deterministic policy in terms of the channel and buffer state and form a simple log functional suboptimal scheduler that approximately follows the optimal structure. Performance results are given for both constant and bursty Poisson arrivals, and the proposed suboptimal scheduler is compared with the optimal and channel threshold scheduler. Our suboptimal scheduler performs close to the optimal scheduler for every feasible delay and is robust to different channel parameters, number of actions and incoming traffic distributions.

Published in:

Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:5 ,  Issue: 2 )