Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Performance comparison of a large volume CZT semiconductor detector and a LaBr3(Ce) scintillator detector

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Gonzalez, R. ; CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain ; Perez, J.M. ; Vela, O. ; de Burgos, E.

The development of portable nuclear instrumentation demands compact high sensitivity detectors operated at room temperature. The sensitivity of these detectors mainly depends on two parameters: absolute efficiency and energy resolution in the range 10-1500 keV. In order to provide high efficiency, large volumes are needed. For semiconductor detectors able to operate at room temperature, the largest effective volumes with acceptable resolution are achieved with CdZnTe coplanar-grid and pixel detectors. On the other hand, new scintillation materials have been recently developed with spectrometric capabilities only reachable, some years ago, with semiconductors. In this work we compare the performance of two states of the art detectors of different technologies with relative large volume: a coplanar-grid CdZnTe detector with dimensions 15 mm×15 mm×10 mm and a LaBr3(Ce) crystal with volume 18 mm×18 mm×30 mm. The CdZnTe crystal was made by Yinnel Tech (USA) and the detector was manufactured by BSI (LV). The LaBr3(Ce) scintillator was grown and made by Saint-Gobain (F). The energy resolution for the CZT detector is 2.05% FWHM at 662 keV. The resolution for the scintillator at this energy is near 3%. The total efficiency was studied in a setup with calibrated point sources. The experimental spectrum were compared with Monte-Carlo simulations performed with Geant4. Loss of total and photopeak efficiency due to detector defects was analyzed. The implications of the results of this comparison are discussed with regards to the practical use of these units.

Published in:

Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005 IEEE  (Volume:3 )

Date of Conference:

23-29 Oct. 2005

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.