Close category search window
 

Efficient SAT-based combinational ATPG using multi-level don't-cares

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Saluja, N.S. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Colorado Univ., Boulder, CO ; Khatri, S.P.

In this paper, we present two combinational ATPG algorithms for combinational designs. These algorithms utilize the multi-level don't cares that are computed for the design during technology independent logic optimization. They are based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT), and utilize the single stuck-at fault model. Both algorithms make use of the compatible observability don't cares (CODCs) associated with nodes of the circuit, to speed up the ATPG process. For large circuits, both algorithms make use of approximate CODCs (ACODCs), which we can compute efficiently. Our first technique speeds up fault propagation by modifying the active clauses in the transitive fanout (TFO) of the fault site. In our second technique, we define new j-active variables for specific nodes in the transitive fanin (TFI) of the fault site. Using these j-active variables we write additional clauses to speed up fault justification. Experimental results demonstrate that the combination of these techniques (when using CODCs) results in an average reduction of 45% in ATPG run-times. When ACODCs are used, a speed-up of about 30% is obtained in the ATPG run-times for large designs. We compared our method against a commercial structural ATPG tool as well. Our method was slower for small designs, but for large designs, we obtained a 31% average speedup over the commercial tool

Published in:
Test Conference, 2005. Proceedings. ITC 2005. IEEE International

Date of Conference: 8-8 Nov. 2005

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.