By Topic

Which transmission mechanism is best for space Internet: window-based, rate-based, or a hybrid of the two?

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Ruhai Wang ; Lamar Univ., Beaumont, TX, USA ; Gutha, B.I. ; Horan, S. ; Yang Xiao
more authors

There is an urgent need to find the best congestion-control mechanism for space Internet. This article presents an experimental study of rate-based congestion control, window-based congestion control, and a hybrid of the two in a simulated small-satellite environment using the space-to-ground link simulation (SGLS) testbed. The study is done by examining the throughput performance and transmission behavior of pure rate-control and a variant of each of the window-based transmission control protocol (TCP) selective acknowledgment (TCP-SACK) and TCP-Vegas congestion-control mechanisms, with and without the channel-rate control being hybridized. The study reveals that the traffic-shaping mechanism of a rate-based transmission mechanism is more effective than the bursty flow of window-based mechanisms in error-prone space environments with a long link delay. Pure rate-control is preferable to other mechanisms in space in which channel resource reservation is available. The performance differences arise from their different behaviors in controlling data transmission.

Published in:

Wireless Communications, IEEE  (Volume:12 ,  Issue: 6 )