Scheduled System Maintenance:
On May 6th, single article purchases and IEEE account management will be unavailable from 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET (12:00 - 16:00 UTC). We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Update on the antitrust ghost in the standard-setting machine [patents]

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)

This article presents Richard Stern's Micro Law paper in the May-June 2005 issue of IEEE Micro, by two lawyers involved in presenting Hewlett-Packard's RAND proposal to the IEEE PatCom recently. The paper captured the essence of a long-running obstacle to addressing the anticompetitive patent "hold-up" that undermines the open-standards objectives of standards developing organizations (SDOs). That obstacle is the misconceived fear of antitrust liability if an SDO allows any consideration of license intentions beyond vague or vacuous commitments to reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) licensing during the course of a standard-setting process.

Published in:

Micro, IEEE  (Volume:25 ,  Issue: 5 )