Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Improved determination of the best fitting sine wave in ADC testing

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kollar, I. ; Dept. of Meas. & Inf. Syst., Budapest Univ. of Technol. & Econ., Hungary ; Blair, Jerome J.

The sine wave test of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) means to excite the ADC with a pure sine wave, look for the sine wave which best fits the output in least squares (LS) sense, and analyze the difference. This is described in the IEEE standards 1241-2000 and 1057-1994. Least squares is the "best" fitting method most of us can imagine, and it yields very good results indeed. Its known properties are achieved when the error (the deviation of the samples from the true sine wave) is random, white (the error samples are all independent), with zero mean Gaussian distribution. Then, the LS fit coincides with the maximum likelihood estimate of the parameters. However, in sine wave testing of ADCs, these assumptions are far from being true. The quantization error is partly deterministic, and the sample values are strongly interdependent. For sine waves covering less than, say, 20 quantum levels, this makes the sine wave fit worse than expected, and since small changes in the sine wave affect the residuals significantly, especially close to the peaks, ADC error analysis may become misleading. Processing of the residuals [e.g., the calculation of the effective number of bits, (ENOB)] can exhibit serious errors. This paper describes this phenomenon, analyzes its consequences, and suggests modified processing of samples and residuals to reduce the errors to negligible level.

Published in:

Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:54 ,  Issue: 5 )

Date of Publication:

Oct. 2005

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.