By Topic

Corner bonding of CSPs: processing and reliability

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Guoyun Tian ; Electr. & Comput. Eng. Dept., Auburn Univ., AL, USA ; Yueli Liu ; Johnson, R.W. ; Lall, P.
more authors

The use of chip-scale packages (CSPs) has expanded rapidly, particularly in portable electronic products. Many CSP designs will meet the thermal cycle or thermal shock requirements for these applications. However, mechanical shock (drop) and bending requirements often necessitate the use of underfills to increase the mechanical strength of the CSP-to-board connection. Capillary flow underfills processed after reflow provide the most common solution to improving mechanical reliability. However, capillary underfill dispense, flow, and cure steps and the associated equipment add cost and complexity to the assembly process. Corner bonding provides an alternate approach. Dots of underfill are dispensed at the four corners of the CSP site after solder paste print but before CSP placement. During reflow, the underfill cures, providing mechanical coupling between the CSP and the board at the corners of the CSP. Since only small areas of underfill are used, board dehydration is not required. This paper examines the manufacturing process for corner bonding including dispense volume, CSP placement, and reflow. Drop test results are then presented. A conventional, capillary process was used for comparison of drop test results. Test results with corner bonding were intermediate between complete capillary underfill and nonunderfilled CSPs. Finite-element modeling results for the drop test are also included.

Published in:

Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:28 ,  Issue: 3 )