By Topic

Joint angle control by FES using a feedback error learning controller

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
K. Kurosawa ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Tohoku Univ., Sendai, Japan ; R. Futami ; T. Watanabe ; N. Hoshimiya

The feedback error learning (FEL) scheme was studied for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) controller. This FEL controller was a hybrid regulator with a feedforward and a feedback controller. The feedforward controller learned the inverse dynamics of a controlled object from feedback controller outputs while control. A four-layered neural network and the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller were used for each controller. The palmar/dorsi-flexion angle of the wrist was controlled in both computer simulation and FES experiments. Some controller parameters, such as the learning speed coefficient and the number of neurons, were determined in simulation using an artificial forward model of the wrist. The forward model was prepared by using a neural network that can imitate responses of subject's wrist to electrical stimulation. Then, six able-bodied subjects' wrist was controlled with the FEL controller by delivering stimuli to one antagonistic muscle pair. Results showed that the FEL controller functioned as expected and performed better than the conventional PID controller adjusted by the Chien, Hrones and Reswick method for a fast movement with the cycle period of 2 s, resulting in decrease of the average tracking error and shortened delay in the response. Furthermore, learning iteration was shortened if the feedforward controller had been trained in advance with the artificial forward model.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering  (Volume:13 ,  Issue: 3 )