By Topic

Resolution, overlay, and field-size for lithography systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Broers, Alec N. ; IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York

Resolution, overlay, and field size limits for U.V., x-ray, electron beam and ion beam lithography are described. Economic trade-offs between the methods, and their suitability for particular thin film device applications, are not considered. The following are some of the conclusions that are discussed. 1) At 1µ linewidth, contrast for optical projection can be higher than that for electron beam. 2) X-ray lithography offers the highest contrast and resist aspect ratio for linewidths above about 0.1µ, but for dimensions below 0.1µ, highest aspect ratio is obtained with electron beam. 3) With electron beam exposure on a bulk sample, contrast for 50nm linewidth is the same as that for 1µ linewidth, provided the resist is thin. 4) Ultimately the range of secondary electrons limits resolution in E/B lithography, just as the range of photoelectrons limits resolution in x-ray lithography. In both cases, minimum linewidth and spacing in dense patterns is about 20nm.

Published in:

Electron Devices Meeting, 1980 International  (Volume:26 )

Date of Conference: