Close category search window
 

High resolution insert for clinical whole body PET scanners: design and optimization

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Janecek, M. ; Mallinckrodt Inst. of Radiol., Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO, USA ; Heyu Wu ; Tai, Y.-C.

We are developing an insert device that will improve image resolution within a smaller FOV for clinical whole-body PET scanners. To optimize its design, we modified simSET to simulate the insert and a PET scanner. The system consists of two detector rings. The inner ring represents an insert (r = 153 mm) with high-resolution detectors using 10 mm thick LSO. The outer ring represents a PET scanner (R = 413 mm) with 25 mm thick LSO. Events were binned into 3 sets of sinograms assuming a 2.4 and 6.75 mm crystal-pitch for the insert and the PET scanner, respectively. The detectors in the insert are modeled as 1, 2, 3, or 4 layers with different offset configurations to evaluate the impact of DOL Results show that image resolution at 1 cm radial offset is improved from 5.0 mm FWHM of the original PET scanner to 1.8 mm with the insert. At 12 cm offset, the resolution of the original system is 5.4 and 6.5 mm for radial and tangential directions, respectively. With the insert, the radial resolution is 5.0 mm FWHM for a single-layer detector design, but improves to 2.7, 2.4, and 2.1mm for 2, 3, and 4 layer DOI detectors, respectively. Different offsets for multi-layer detectors have negligible effect on resolution. Sensitivity of the device is, assuming the insert has a 2 cm axial extend, estimated to be 3.3%, including coincidence events from the insert-alone and insert-to-scanner sinograms. In contrast, if the insert is used as a standalone microPET scanner, its sensitivity is 1.3%.

Published in:
Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004 IEEE  (Volume:6 )

Date of Conference: 16-22 Oct. 2004

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.