By Topic

Residential cool storage: peak load reduction alternatives

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
A. Traca de Almeida ; Coimbra Univ., Portugal ; J. M. Yokoe

The authors investigate alternatives for achieving a peak load reduction in the residential airconditioning sector from a technical and economic point of view. Several thermal energy storage technologies are assessed, considering different types of houses and storage schemes. If the utility offered an incentive of $300-400/kW of deferred peak, residential thermal energy storage would have a short payback time for new installations. The payback time for retrofits is unacceptable. Two-stage evaporative coolers can reduce peak power by 60%, with an extra cost of about one-fifth that of new peaking facilities. They can totally replace conventional air conditioning in some climates without any loss of comfort. High efficiency air conditioners can also reduce peak power but their incremental cost over standard units is higher than that of new peaking facilities.<>

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems  (Volume:3 ,  Issue: 3 )