By Topic

Search bias in ant colony optimization: on the role of competition-balanced systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Blum, C. ; Dept. of Llenguatges i Sistemes Informatics, Univ. Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain ; Dorigo, M.

One of the problems encountered when applying ant colony optimization (ACO) to combinatorial optimization problems is that the search process is sometimes biased by algorithm features such as the pheromone model and the solution construction process. Sometimes this bias is harmful and results in a decrease in algorithm performance over time, which is called second-order deception. In this work, we study the reasons for the occurrence of second-order deception. In this context, we introduce the concept of competition-balanced system (CBS), which is a property of the combination of an ACO algorithm with a problem instance. We show by means of an example that combinations of ACO algorithms with problem instances that are not CBSs may suffer from a bias that leads to second-order deception. Finally, we show that the choice of an appropriate pheromone model is crucial for the success of the ACO algorithm, and it can help avoid second-order deception.

Published in:

Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:9 ,  Issue: 2 )