Close category search window
 

Uncertainties in 3-m radiated emission measurements due to the use of different types of receive antennas

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
van Dijk, N. ; Philips Digital Syst. Labs., Eindhoven, Netherlands

This work describes the results of an investigation into uncertainties in radiated emission measurement results due to the use of different receive antennas. These antennas are used during electromagnetic-compatibility tests of products which must comply with regulatory radiated emission requirements. In the past few years, the standardization International Special Committee for Radio Protection (CISPR) Subcommittee A (SCA) has tried to improve the radiated emission measurements by quantifying most of the uncertainty sources. We deal with the uncertainty due to the free space antenna factor's inability to fully specify the antenna properties at frequencies up to 1000 MHz. We have simulated and measured the radiated emission of an equipment-under-test (EUT) using various types of receive antennas. The simulated radiated emission measurement results using a biconical antenna give a maximum difference of 1.2 dB in relation to the use of a tuned dipole. The use of bow-tie antennas leads to a radiated emission difference of maximal 2.5 dB in relation to the tuned dipole. Finally, the use of a log-periodical antenna leads to a maximum deviation of 2.8 dB in relation to the tuned dipole. This means that the uncertainty caused by using different types of receive antennas in 3-m radiated emission measurements may be significant, so the presented uncertainty budgets in CISPR 16-4-2 should therefore be reconsidered and expanded.

Published in:
Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:47 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication: Feb. 2005

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.