By Topic

WCET code positioning

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Zhao, W. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL, USA ; Whalley, D. ; Healy, C. ; Mueller, F.

Some processors incur a pipeline delay whenever an instruction transfers control to a target that is not the next sequential instruction. Compiler writers attempt to reduce these delays by positioning the basic blocks within a function to minimize the number of unconditional jumps and taken conditional branches that occur. Such a code positioning algorithm is traditionally driven by profile data representing typical program executions where pairs of blocks are placed in contiguous order when the transitions between these blocks occur most frequently. In this paper we describe an approach to perform code positioning without profiling in an attempt to reduce WCET instead of ACET. Our compiler interacts with a timing analyzer to obtain WCET path information to guide the block positioning. The results show over a 9% average reduction in WCET is achieved after code positioning is performed and our greedy WCET code positioning algorithm always achieves optimal results for our benchmark suite.

Published in:

Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2004. Proceedings. 25th IEEE International

Date of Conference:

5-8 Dec. 2004