By Topic

The impact of energy band diagram and inhomogeneous broadening on the optical differential gain in nanostructure lasers

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Dery, H. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Technion-Israel Inst. of Technol., Haifa, Israel ; Eisenstein, G.

We present a general theoretical model for the optical differential gain in semiconductor lasers. The model describes self assembly quantum dots (QDs), self assembly quantum wires (QWRs) and single quantum-well lasers. We have introduced the inhomogeneous broadening due to size fluctuations in the assembly cases. At each dimensionality, we have considered the carrier populations in the excited states and in the reservoirs, where conduction and valence bands are treated separately. We show that for room temperature operation the differential gain reduction due to increased size inhomogeneity is more pronounced in QDs than in QWRs. We show this reduction to be smaller than the one-order reduction attributed to state filling in conventional dot and wire assemblies operating at room temperature. The integration prefactor coefficient of the differential gain in zero-dimensional cases exceed one- and two-dimensional coefficients only for low temperatures where the homogenous broadening is considerably smaller than the thermal energy. The differential gain of QDs, QWRs, and compressively strained single quantum-well lasers operating at room temperature and close to equilibrium is nearly the same.

Published in:

Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:41 ,  Issue: 1 )