Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Quantized stabilization of linear systems: complexity versus performance

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Fagnani, F. ; Dept. of Math., Politecnico di Torino, Italy ; Zampieri, S.

Quantized feedback control has been receiving much attention in the control community in the past few years. Quantization is indeed a natural way to take into consideration in the control design the complexity constraints of the controller as well as the communication constraints in the information exchange between the controller and the plant. In this paper, we analyze the stabilization problem for discrete time linear systems with multidimensional state and one-dimensional input using quantized feedbacks with a memory structure, focusing on the tradeoff between complexity and performance. A quantized controller with memory is a dynamical system with a state space, a state updating map and an output map. The quantized controller complexity is modeled by means of three indexes. The first index L coincides with the number of the controller states. The second index is the number M of the possible values that the state updating map of the controller can take at each time. The third index is the number N of the possible values that the output map of the controller can take at each time. The index N corresponds also to the number of the possible control values that the controller can choose at each time. In this paper, the performance index is chosen to be the time T needed to shrink the state of the plant from a starting set to a target set. Finally, the contraction rate C, namely the ratio between the volumes of the starting and target sets, is introduced. We evaluate the relations between these parameters for various quantized stabilizers, with and without memory, and we make some comparisons. Then, we prove a number of results showing the intrinsic limitations of the quantized control. In particular, we show that, in order to obtain a control strategy which yields arbitrarily small values of T/lnC (requirement which can be interpreted as a weak form of the pole assignability property), we need to have that LN/lnC is big enough.

Published in:

Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:49 ,  Issue: 9 )

Date of Publication:

Sept. 2004

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.