By Topic

Uncertainty evaluation of dosimetry due to plastic holder for restraining small animal in in vivo near field exposure setup

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Jianqing Wang ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Nagoya Inst. of Technol., Japan ; Saito, T. ; Fujiwara, O.

In most in vivo exposure setups for testing biological effects of cellular telephones on a small animal, a plastic holder is commonly used for restraining the small animal in order to keep a constant near-field exposure. Although the plastic holder should affect the specific absorption rate (SAR) in the small animal, few researchers have considered its influence in their exposure setup design or dosimetry evaluation. We previously developed an in vivo exposure setup for testing the promoting effect of digital cellular telephones on mouse skin carcinogenesis. In this paper, the influence of a plastic holder for restraining the mouse in the exposure setup was investigated numerically and experimentally. The numerical investigation was conducted by using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method together with a realistically shaped mouse model. The validity of the FDTD modeling was verified by the antenna impedance measurement. As a result, an increase of 18% on the peak SAR was found due to the presence of the mouse holder.

Published in:

Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:46 ,  Issue: 2 )