Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Ultrasound scatterer size estimation technique based on a 3D acoustic impedance map from histologic sections

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Mamou, J. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA ; Oelze, M.L. ; Zachary, J.F. ; O'Brien, W.D.

Identifying the scatterers and obtaining accurate estimates of ultrasonic scatterer sizes are beneficial adjuncts to characterize (diagnose) disease from ultrasonic backscatterer measurements. A new scatterer size estimation technique has been developed that is based on a 3D acoustic impedance map. Ultrasonic scatterer estimation techniques rely extensively on form factor functions to obtain estimates, and 3D impedance maps can be used to derive independently form factors. The 3D acoustic impedance map is derived from a 3D histological data set of tissue, and is independent of ultrasonically acquired data. A rat fibroadenoma and a mouse 4T1 mouse mammary tumor (MMT) were fixed (10% neutral-buffered formalin), embedded in paraffin, serially sectioned at 10 μm and 5 μm respectively, and stained with H&E for histologic evaluation. Each section was digitally photographed through the light microscope. Tissue structures in each section were assigned distinct acoustic impedance values. The images from serial sections were aligned to yield two 3D impedance data set. A Gaussian form factor was used to estimate scatterer size and acoustic concentration. The scatterer size estimates were compared to previous values that were obtained from ultrasonic backscatterer measurements (also using a Gaussian form factor). For both 3D impedance maps, the relative difference between the size estimates were below 10%. The optimization scheme was also conducted on two simulated medium and led to relative errors below 1% for the scatterer size. This approach demonstrates that the use of 3D impedance maps has significant potential for improving parametric imaging by evaluating form factor functions.

Published in:

Ultrasonics, 2003 IEEE Symposium on  (Volume:1 )

Date of Conference:

5-8 Oct. 2003

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.