By Topic

A comparative study of two Boolean formulations of FPGA detailed routing constraints

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)

We present empirical analyses of two Boolean satisfiability (SAT) formulations of FPGA (field programmable gate array) detailed routing constraints. Boolean SAT-based routing transforms a routing problem into a Boolean SAT instance by rendering geometric routing constraints as an atomic Boolean function. The generated Boolean function is satisfiable if and only if the corresponding routing is possible. Two different Boolean SAT-based routing models are analyzed: the track-based and the route-based routing constraint model. The track-based routing model transforms a routing task into a net-to-track assignment problem, whereas the route-based routing model reduces it into a routability-checking problem with explicitly enumerated set of detailed routes for nets. In both models, routing constraints are represented as CNF Boolean satisfiability clauses. Through comparative experiments, we demonstrate that the route-based formulation yields an easier-to-evaluate and more scalable routability Boolean function than the track-based method. This is empirical evidence that a smart/efficient Boolean formulation can achieve significant performance improvement in real-world applications.

Published in:

Computers, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:53 ,  Issue: 6 )