Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

A comparison of planar versus volumetric numerical observers for detection task performance in whole-body PET imaging

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Jae-Seung Kim ; Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA ; Kinahan, P.E. ; Lartizien, C. ; Comtat, C.
more authors

The goal of this project is to determine if there is a difference between planar and volumetric numerical observers. The motivation comes from the use of a volumetric (3-D) display of image data (i.e., three orthogonal views through a volume image) to assess whole-body PET images in most, if not all, clinical PET centers. Studies of correlations between numerical observers and human observers (e.g., using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) detection analysis), however, typically use a planar (2-D) display and analysis methodology. In particular, planar implementations of the nonprewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) and the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) have been extensively investigated as surrogates for measuring human detection task performance. To determine if there is a difference between planar and volumetric numerical observers, we analyzed the behavior of 2-D and 3-D implementations of the NPWMF and CHO numerical observers with multiple realizations of images with noise properties similar to those of whole-body PET oncology imaging. The results indicate that there is a significant increase in SNR or detectability of volumetric numerical observers relative to planar observers. This implies that volumetric and planar numerical observers may have different strengths of correlation with human observer performance, and that these correlations should be determined prior to using numerical observers to optimize algorithm or protocol performance for whole-body PET imaging. When axial smoothing is applied, however, to impose isotropic target resolution or to simulate fully 3-D PET data, the detectabilities of planar numerical observers are increased and the differences between planar and volumetric numerical observers become less significant.

Published in:

Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:51 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication:

Feb. 2004

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.