Notification:
We are currently experiencing intermittent issues impacting performance. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Architecture and synthesis for on-chip multicycle communication

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Cong, J. ; Comput. Sci. Dept., Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Yiping Fan ; Han, G. ; Xun Yang
more authors

For multigigahertz designs in nanometer technologies, data transfers on global interconnects take multiple clock cycles. In this paper, we propose a regular distributed register (RDR) microarchitecture, which offers high regularity and direct support of multicycle on-chip communication. The RDR microarchitecture divides the entire chip into an array of islands so that all local computation and communication within an island can be performed in a single clock cycle. Each island contains a cluster of computational elements, local registers, and a local controller. On top of the RDR microarchitecture, novel layout-driven architectural synthesis algorithms have been developed for multicycle communication, including scheduling-driven placement, placement-driven simultaneous scheduling with rebinding, and distributed control generation, etc. The experimentation on a number of real-life examples demonstrates promising results. For data flow intensive examples, we obtain a 44% improvement on average in terms of the clock period and a 37% improvement on average in terms of the final latency, over the traditional flow. For designs with control flow, our approach achieves a 28% clock-period reduction and a 23% latency reduction on average.

Published in:

Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:23 ,  Issue: 4 )