By Topic

Comparison of planar vs. SPECT images for lesion detectability

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)

This research used computer simulation along with human observer studies to evaluate SPECT and planar imaging for lesion detection. The research initially focused on a simple computer simulated phantom consisting of a large sphere with a lesion placed inside at various depths. A constant lesion to background ratio of 8 to 1 was maintained throughout the trials. Two noise levels were simulated by varying the mean value of the sphere and lesion. Both planar and SPECT images were generated simulating a clinical scan time of 30 minutes. Results showed SPECT images consistently had higher contrast but also higher noise values than planar images. When the lesion was located near the center of the sphere the contrast-to-noise ratio was consistently higher in SPECT images. Research using a realistic computer model of the human torso along with realistic image acquisition and reconstruction techniques was then carried out. Planar images were generated with modeling attenuation, scatter and geometric point response. SPECT images were projected and then reconstructed with an OSEM algorithm accounting for attenuation, the scatter and the geometric point response of the collimator.

Published in:

Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE  (Volume:3 )

Date of Conference:

10-16 Nov. 2002