By Topic

SPMD cluster-based parallel 3D OSEM

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

10 Author(s)
J. P. Jones ; CPS Innovations, Knoxville, TN, USA ; W. F. Jones ; F. Kehren ; D. F. Newport
more authors

This study empirically compares two approaches to parallel 3D OSEM that differ as to whether calculations are assigned to nodes by projection number or by transaxial plane number. For projection space decomposition (PSD), the forward projection is completely parallel, but backprojection requires a slow image synchronization. For image space decomposition (ISD), the communication associated with forward projection can be overlapped with calculation, and the communication associated with backprojection is more efficient. To compare these methods, an implementation of 3D OSEM for three PET scanners is developed that runs on an experimental, 9-node, 18-processor cluster computer. For selected benchmarks, both methods exhibit speedups in excess of 8 for 9 nodes, and comparable performance for the tested range of cluster sizes.

Published in:

Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE  (Volume:3 )

Date of Conference:

10-16 Nov. 2002