Close category search window
 

A performance comparison of DSM, PVM, and MPI

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Werstein, P. ; Otago Univ., Dunedin, New Zealand ; Pethick, M. ; Zhiyi Huang

We compare the performance of the Treadmarks DSM system with two popular message passing systems (PVM and MPI). The comparison is done on 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 nodes. Applications are chosen to represent three classes of problems: loosely synchronous, embarrassingly parallel, and synchronous. The results show DSM has similar performance to message passing for the embarrassingly parallel class. However the performance of DSM is lower than PVM and MPI for the synchronous and loosely synchronous classes of problems. An analysis of the reasons is presented.

Published in:
Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2003. PDCAT'2003. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on

Date of Conference: 27-29 Aug. 2003

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.