Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Goncalve, S. ; MEG Centre, Vrije Univ. Med. Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands ; de Munck, J.C. ; Verbunt, J.P.A. ; Heethaar, R.M.
more authors

Results of "in vivo" measurements of the skull and brain resistivities are presented for six subjects. Results are obtained using two different methods, based on spherical head models. The first method uses the principles of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to estimate the equivalent electrical resistivities of brain (ρbrain), skull (ρskull) and skin (ρskin) according to S. Goncalves et al., Physiol. Meas., vol. 21, p. 379-93 (2000).. The second one estimates the same parameters through a combined analysis of the evoked somatosensory cortical response, recorded simultaneously using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). The EIT results, obtained with the same relative skull thickness (0.05) for all subjects, show a wide variation of the ratio ρskullbrain among subjects (average =72, SD=48%). However, the ρskullbrain ratios of the individual subjects are well reproduced by combined analysis of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). These preliminary results suggest that the ρskullbrain variations over subjects cannot be disregarded in the EEG inverse problem (IP) when a spherical model is used. The agreement between EIT and SEF/SEP points to the fact that whatever the source of variability, the proposed EIT-based method skull/ρbrain, ρbrain, ρskull and ρskin.

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:50 ,  Issue: 9 )

Date of Publication:

Sept. 2003

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.