By Topic

Comments on "Passivity-based control of saturated induction motors"

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Novotnak, R.T. ; Aerotech Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Chiasson, J.

The authors comment on the paper by L.U. Gokdere et al. (see ibid., vol. 48, p.870-2, 2001). A review of the experimental evidence shows that passivity-based control of saturated induction motors does not provide superior performance over input-ouput linearization. Higher tracking errors can be observed and traced to the open-loop nature of the flux controller. In contrast, input-output linearization controllers achieve close tracking of flux, speed, and position references for the most demanding trajectories.

Published in:

Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:50 ,  Issue: 4 )