By Topic

Pole tip recession in linear recording heads

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Sourty, E. ; Sch. of Eng. & Appl. Sci., Univ. of Aston, Birmingham, UK ; Sullivan, J.L. ; de Jong, L.A.M.

Using a range of experimental techniques-optical and atomic force microscopy, and Auger electron spectroscopy-we have identified the major processes responsible for pole tip recession (PTR) in linear tape recording systems. Within a few tens of hours, TiC grain fragments pulled out from the tape-bearing surface ceramic (Al2O3-TiC) are trapped in the pole tip region and, hence, act as three-body abrasive particles. This dramatically increases PTR. We used a numerical model to calculate the depth of the head subsurface von Mises stress maximum. The result (a depth of about 30 nm) is comparable to the TiC pullout depth. A fatigue mechanism is thus likely to rely on generation and propagation of cracks at that depth, which causes TiC grains to pull out. To overcome this phenomenon, we considered two solutions. 1) Recording heads coated with two different superprotective layers (SPL)-CrO2 coating-thicknesses, 20 and 40 nm, were tested in various environments. The maximum stress location, either in the substrate (20-nm SPL) or at the interface (40-nm SPL), was found to control the coating wear resistance. 2) Dummy heads consisting of a single-phase ceramic (Al2O3) as an alternative to Al2O3-TiC were also tested; no evidence of fatigue brittle fracture was found.

Published in:

Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:39 ,  Issue: 3 )