By Topic

Distributed versus compartment models for PET receptor studies

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Muzic, R.F., Jr. ; Dept. of Nucl. Medicine, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH, USA ; Saidel, G.

Although distributed models are generally accepted as being more realistic than compartment models, use of simpler compartment models is pervasive in nuclear medicine applications, particularly in positron emission tomography (PET). Here, we report on comparisons made between distributed and compartment model outputs to address the question of whether differences between them are sufficient to justify distributed models for analysis of PET receptor experiments. For both two- and three-injection experiments, "data" sets were obtained by simulation using a distributed model and a wide range of parameter values. Optimal fits of the compartment model output to these "data" were achieved with three strategies in which values of different groups of parameter were estimated. Compartment model outputs yielded good fits to all the distributed model outputs and the values of the corresponding parameters were in close agreement. Given the temporal resolution typically available with PET, the use of a distributed model has no advantage over a compartment model for PET receptor quantification.

Published in:

Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:22 ,  Issue: 1 )