By Topic

Optimal sensor selection for discrete-event systems with partial observation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Shengbing Jiang ; Gen. Motors R&D & Planning, Warren, MI, USA ; Kumar, R. ; Garcia, H.E.

For discrete-event systems under partial observation, we study the problem of selection of an optimal set of sensors that can provide sufficient yet minimal events observation information. The sufficiency of the observed information is captured as the fulfillment of a desired formal property. Selection of sensors can be viewed as a selection of an observation mask and also of an equivalence class of events. A sensor set is called optimal if any coarser selection of the corresponding equivalence class of events results in some significant loss of the events observation information. We study an optimal selection of sensors over the set of general "nonprojection" observation masks. We show that this problem is NP hard in general. For mask-monotonic properties, we present a "top-down" and a "bottom-up" algorithm each of polynomial complexity. We show that observerness is not mask-monotonic. We show that the computational complexity can be further improved if the property is preserved under the projection via an intermediary observation mask that is an observer. Our results are obtained in a general setting so that they can be adapted for an optimal selection of sensors for a variety of applications.

Published in:

Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:48 ,  Issue: 3 )