By Topic

New graphical IDDQ signatures reduce defect level and yield loss

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Rao, L. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Rutgers Univ., Piscataway, NJ, USA ; Bushnell, M.L. ; Agrawal, V.D.

The measured IDDQ current as a function of vectors is defined here as the IDDQ signature of a chip. We examined the IDDQ signatures of a large number of SEMATECH chips that have been classified as good or bad by a combined decision from functional, delay and scan tests. We find that a single IDDQ threshold, whether absolute or differential, cannot separate good/bad chips with any desirable accuracy, because the good chip signature can be any one of several well-defined graphs. In general, the signature of a good chip is found to contain, discrete levels (or bands) of varying widths and separations. A faulty chip almost always displays noise and glitches in the band structure. Based on observations, we develop a set of five graphical criteria, which provide lower defect level and yield loss compared to other non-IDDQ test methods. The reason is that the graphical procedure customizes the decision for the chip-under-test, and may substantially reduce the usage of other conventional tests.

Published in:

VLSI Design, 2003. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on

Date of Conference:

4-8 Jan. 2003