By Topic

Comparing three methods of measuring human judgment performance in an air traffic conflict prediction task

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Bass, E.J. ; Dept. of Syst. Eng., Virginia Univ., Charlottesville, VA, USA ; Rudra, S.

An experiment using a simulated air traffic conflict prediction task with sensor noise was conducted with one between subjects manipulation and the sensor noise level. Measures from signal detection theory, fuzzy signal detection theory, and judgment analysis were calculated and analyzed. Gender, noise, and session (experience) effects and their two-way interactions were investigated. As different effects were significant for different measures, analysts should take care in relying on the results from any single measure when analyzing human judgment performance.

Published in:

Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2002 IEEE International Conference on  (Volume:6 )

Date of Conference:

6-9 Oct. 2002