Scheduled System Maintenance:
On Monday, April 27th, IEEE Xplore will undergo scheduled maintenance from 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM ET (17:00 - 19:00 UTC). No interruption in service is anticipated.
By Topic

Neural networks, maximum mutual information training, and maximum likelihood training [speech recognition]

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Niles, L.T. ; Div. of Eng., Brown Univ., Providence, RI, USA ; Silverman, H.F. ; Bush, M.

A Gaussian-model classifier trained by maximum mutual information estimation (MMIE) is compared to one trained by maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) and to an artificial neural network (ANN) on several classification tasks. Similarity of MMIE and ANN results for uniformly distributed data confirm that the ANN is better than the MLE in some cases due to the ANNs use of an error-correcting training algorithm. When the probability model fits the data well, MLE is better than MMIE if the training data are limited, but they are equal if there are enough data. When the model is a poor fit, MMIE is better than MLE. Training dynamics of MMIE and ANN are shown to be similar under certain assumptions. MMIE seems more susceptible to overtraining and computational difficulties than the ANN. Overall, ANN is the most robust of the classifiers

Published in:

Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1990. ICASSP-90., 1990 International Conference on

Date of Conference:

3-6 Apr 1990