By Topic

9-GHz Complex Permittivity Measurements of High-Loss Liquids Using a Variable-Length Reflection Cavity and a Dual-Channel, Double Superheterodyne Signal Processing System

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)

This paper evaluates those factors which limit the accuracy with which microwave complex permittivity measurements of high-loss liquids can be made using a variable-length reflection sample cell spectrometer. Measurements made at 0.001-in increments from a cell length of 0.11 into 0.31 in were found to be statistically independent of the reflector diameter in the interval 0.5 in to 4.25 in. The data were analyzed using expressions for the amplitude and phase derived assuming a plane wave model. It is found that the permittivity epsilon' and the loss epsilon" can be determined typically to a precision of 0.3 percent and 0.5 percent, respectively, using a 9.354-GHz dual-channel, double superheterodyne signal processing system. However, there is a discrepancy of about two standard deviations between the values of epsilon' and epsilon" obtained from the phase data and those obtained from the amplitude data. Moreover, it is also found that the values of epsilon' and epsilon" caculated from these data differ by more than three standard deviations from those obtained using a variable-length transmission sample cell and the same signal processing system. These discrepancies, which exceed 1 percent are attributed to deficiencies in the plane wave model. It has been confirmed using 0.011 and 0.051 mol l-1 KCl solutions that the sensitivity achievable with the reflection cell is less by a factor of 100 than that with a transmission sample cell, which is in agreement with the estimated precision obtainable with these two different types of sample cells.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques  (Volume:35 ,  Issue: 10 )