Close category search window
 

Feedback control system synthesis for plants with large parameter variations

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Rolnik, J. ; Hughes Aircraft Company, Canoga Park, CA, USA ; Horowitz, I.M.

A synthesis procedure is developed for a dominant third-order system (as opposed to the usual dominant second-order system) where the size of the complex closed-loop pole region is not specifically restricted but is contained within a circular boundary. The plant considered is of third order, with a real pole at the origin and a pair of complex poles with negative real parts. The added real pole affords an additional degree of freedom with which to meet the system-time domain specifications. The compensation prescribed is a biquadratic network with complex zeros, and compensation poles are constrained to exhibit only second-order effects. The procedure is based on the association of the desired closed-loop pole parameter values with open-loop parameter values in the (Omega^{2},Sigma) plane, which is in actuality the natural-frequency-squared damping-constant plane. A constant gain factor is assumed, but this constraint may be removed if a tandem gain control system is employed. This assures that the gain variations are much slower than the system response. Relations between the desired nominal closed-loop poles and the plant region and compensation locations are derived for a prescribed circular closed-loop pole region. The nominal plant pole location is a design specification, while the allowable plant region depends on the closed-loop pole location and region, i.e., a change in size of one region is reflected as a proportional change in size of the plant closed-loop pole region. The remote compensation pole location is primarily determined by minimizing transient distortion while ensuring a specified degree of stability.

Published in:
Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:14 ,  Issue: 6 )

Date of Publication: Dec 1969

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.