By Topic

Subjective Evaluation of Pre- and Postfiltering in PAM, PCM, and DPCM Voice Communication Systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Chan, D. ; Bell-Northern Res. Ltd.,Ottawa, Ont.,Canada. ; Donaldson, R.W.

In a recent paper [1] the authors obtained the pre- and postfilters that minimize the mean-square error between the messagex(t)and its received replicahat{x}(t)under very general conditions on bothx(t)and the communication system under consideration. The present work compares the subjective effects of systems using optimum mean-square filters (OF) with those using conventional ideal low-pass filters (LF). The systems considered are pulse-amplitude (PAM), pulse-code (PCM), and differential pulsecode (DPCM) modulation systems for voice communication. For reasons presented in this paper, the OF and LF have double-sided bandwidth equal to the sampling frequency. In PAM systems, a white Gaussian channel model is assumed, while negligible channel transmission errors are assumed for PCM and DPCM systems. The subjective evaluation, based on preference tests, shows that subjective differences between PAM systems with OF and systems with LF are insignificant and are independent of sampling frequency and channel signal-to-noise ratio. Also, for those values of sampling frequency and number of bits of quantization considered, no significant differences exist between DPCM systems with OF and systems with LF. For PCM systems, however, significant improvement in subjective performance can be achieved when OFs are used instead of LFs.

Published in:

Communication Technology, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:19 ,  Issue: 5 )