Notification:
We are currently experiencing intermittent issues impacting performance. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Position sensing for high track density recording

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Ragle, H. ; Burroughs Corporation, Westlake Village, CA ; Blessum, N. ; Stromsta, R.

Progress towardhigher digital areal densities is related to the data track position sensing accuracy obtainable in future disk drives. In most systems available, position sensing is done remotely from the data track and subject to different dimensional stability conditions. To obtain higher track densities, position sensing reference information must be moved near the data track. Several techniques are available to embed reference information in the data track. All the techniques described have one of two basic principles of operation. One method uses comparison of reference signal amplitudes and the second method uses arrival time differences of reference signals. The time method is relatively unknown but offers the designer some new alternatives. This paper describes an overview of several methods. Relationships are derived to relate the influence of noise on both basic methods. Linearity, relative hardware simplicity, and track capture range are also discussed. It is our conclusion that the Amplitude or Tri-Bit method offers the greatest hardware simplicity, but is limited by noise and non-linearity at high track densities. The time dependent or Chevron method requires two data channels, but offers a relatively higher noise immunity, better linearity, and higher data capacity.

Published in:

Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:14 ,  Issue: 5 )