By Topic

The effect of model uncertainty on maintenance optimization

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Bunea, C. ; Fac. of Inf. Syst. & Technol., Delft Univ. of Technol., Netherlands ; Bedford, T.

Much operational reliability data available, e.g., in the nuclear industry, is heavily right-censored by preventive maintenance. The common methods for dealing with right-censored data (total time on test statistic, Kaplan-Meier estimator, adjusted rank methods) assume the s-independent competing-risk model for the underlying failure process and the censoring process, even though there are, many s-dependent competing-risk models that can also interpret the data. It is not possible to identify the "correct" competing risk model from censored data. A reasonable question is whether this model uncertainty is of practical importance. This paper considers the impact of this model-uncertainty on maintenance optimization, and shows that it can be substantial. Three competing-risk model classes are presented which can be used to model the data, and determine an optimal maintenance policy. Given these models, then consider the error that is made when optimizing costs using the wrong model. Model uncertainty can be expressed in terms of the "dependence between competing risks" which can be quantified by expert judgment. This enables reformulating the maintenance optimization problem to account for model uncertainty.

Published in:

Reliability, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:51 ,  Issue: 4 )