By Topic

Validity concerns of common heart-rate variability indices

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
B. H. Friedman ; Dept. of Psychol., Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, VA, USA ; M. T. Allen ; I. C. Christie ; A. K. Santucci

Time- and frequency-domain analyses of HRV have provided researchers with important measures of cardiac vagal activity. Stationarity is of theoretical importance for such analyses in the frequency domain but may not be of practical significance in any particular data set. It has been argued that if a stationarity test is available, it should be used. On the other hand, it is also possible that the RSA is quite robust to nonstationarity; the spectral data support that contention. Furthermore, procedures that correct for nonstationary data segments may compromise the representativeness of the data set. With regard to the time domain, MSD is advantageous in that it is conceptually and computationally simple, does not require respiration data, and under many conditions may be a reasonable alternative to HF spectral power or RSA. All told, the selection of cardiac vagal control indices and use of correction procedures should be based upon experimental situation and availability to the researcher, rather than orthodox adherence to idealized standards.

Published in:

IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 4 )