Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

A comparison between impedance measured by a commercial analyzer and your value adjusted by a theoretical model in body composition evaluation

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Neves, C.E.B. ; COPPE, Univ. Fed. do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ; Souza, M.N.

The use of an electrical current for the evaluation of several physiological variables in the human body is not a recent technique but continues to awaken great interest in the research community. One of the greatest applications for such a technique is the study of body composition through bioimpedance, where generally a equipment with a tetrapolar array set of electrodes is used to realize the bioimpedance measurement. The aim of the present work is to show that the bioimpedance measured is normally sub-estimated and to develop a correction factor for such values. The comparison between the original bioimpedance values, obtained by commercial equipment, and their corrected values, in body composition evaluation, will be shown. Body composition tests were conducted on 10 male subjects. Besides the bioimpedance analysis, anthropometric measures consisting of height, weight and skinfold-thickness were also obtained from the subjects to allow an estimation of the body composition by anthropometric equations established in the literature. The comparison results point to a better correlation (Pearson coefficient, r = 0.9735) between the anthropometric estimated fat-free mass (FFM) and the estimated value by the corrected bioimpedance adjusted, when compared with the original ones Pearson coefficient, r = 0.9487.

Published in:

Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2001. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE  (Volume:4 )

Date of Conference:

2001

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.