By Topic

Fitting nature's basic functions. Part III: exponentials, sinusoids, and nonlinear least squares

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
B. W. Rust ; Nat. Inst. of Stand. & Technol., Gaithersburg, MD, USA

For Part II see ibid. vol.3 no.6 (2001). In previous parts we used linear least squares to fit polynomials of various degree to the annual global temperature anomalies for 1856 to 1999. Polynomials are much beloved by mathematicians but are of limited value for modeling measured data. Natural processes often display linear trends, and occasionally a constant acceleration process exhibits quadratic variation. However, higher-order polynomial behavior is rare in nature, which is more likely to produce exponentials, sinusoids, logistics, Gaussians, or other special functions. Modeling such behaviors with high-order polynomials usually gives spurious wiggles between the data points, and low-order polynomial fits give nonrandom residuals. We saw an example of this syndrome in Figure 4 of Part 1 (ibid. vol.3 no.5 (2001)), where we attempted to model a quasicyclic variation with a fifth-degree polynomial. That example also illustrated that polynomial fits usually give unrealistic extrapolations of the data

Published in:

Computing in Science & Engineering  (Volume:4 ,  Issue: 4 )