By Topic

Performance comparison of VLV, ULV, and ECR tests [biomedical IC product]

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Wanli Jiang ; Test Eng., Guidant Corp., St. Paul, MN, USA ; Peterson, E.

Very-Low-Voltage, Ultra-Low-Voltage (a modified version of Minimum-Voltage), and Energy Consumption Ratio (a recently developed test metric) tests are applied as supplemental tests along with existing traditional tests to a biomedical IC product. The effectiveness and efficiency of these supplemental tests are evaluated and compared with some major traditional tests. The effectiveness analysis indicates that Ultra-Low-Voltage and Energy Consumption Ratio tests identified potentially defective devices from good devices. The efficiency analysis shows that the Energy Consumption Ratio test is much more efficient than Very-Low-Voltage, Ultra-Low-Voltage and major traditional tests.

Published in:

VLSI Test Symposium, 2002. (VTS 2002). Proceedings 20th IEEE

Date of Conference: