By Topic

Comparative analysis of double-edge versus single-edge triggered clocked storage elements

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Nedovic, Nikola ; Adv. Comput. Syst. Eng. Lab., California Univ., Davis, CA, USA ; Aleksic, M. ; Oklobdzija, V.G.

We present a comparison of Double-Edge Triggered clocked Storage Elements (DETSE) with their single-edge triggered counterparts in terms of delay and power consumption. In general, Latch-Mux based DETSE perform better then their single-edge counterparts while double-edge triggered flip-flops exhibit performance degradation. Up to 15% improvement in Energy-Delay Product (EDP) of Latch-Mux designs is achieved when using DETSE. The presented results indicate that the use of DETSE is a good choice when low-power operation is required.

Published in:

Circuits and Systems, 2002. ISCAS 2002. IEEE International Symposium on  (Volume:5 )

Date of Conference: