By Topic

What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Freire, L. ; Service Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, CEA, Orsay, France ; Roche, A. ; Mangin, J.-F.

It has been shown that the difference of squares cost function used by standard realignment packages (SPM and AIR) can lead to the detection of spurious activations, because the motion parameter estimations are biased by the activated areas. Therefore, this paper describes several experiments aiming at selecting a better similarity measure to drive functional magnetic resonance image registration. The behaviors of the Geman-McClure (GM) estimator, of the correlation ratio, and of the mutual information (MI) relative to activated areas are studied using simulated time series and actual data stemming from a 3 T magnet. It is shown that these methods are more robust than the usual difference of squares measure. The results suggest also that the measures built from robust metrics like the GM estimator may be the best choice, while MI is also an interesting solution. Some more work, however, is required to compare the various robust metrics proposed in the literature.

Published in:

Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 5 )