By Topic

Performance evaluation of a QoS-aware framework for providing tunable consistency and timeliness

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
S. Krishnamurthy ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA ; W. H. Sanders ; M. Cukier

Strong replica consistency models ensure that the data delivered by a replica always includes the latest updates, although this may result in poor response times. On the other hand, weak replica consistency models provide quicker access to information, but do not usually provide guarantees about the degree of staleness in the data they deliver. In order to support emerging distributed applications that are characterized by high concurrency demands, an increasing shift towards dynamic content, and timely delivery, we need quality of service models that allow us to explore the intermediate space between these two extreme approaches to replica consistency. Further, for better support of time-sensitive applications that can tolerate relaxed consistency in exchange for better responsiveness, we need to understand how the desired level of consistency affects the timeliness of a response. The QoS model we have developed to realize these objectives considers both timeliness and consistency, and treats consistency along two dimensions: order and staleness. We evaluate experimentally the framework we have developed to study the timeliness/consistency tradeoffs for replicated services and present experimental results that compare these tradeoffs in the context of sequential and FIFO ordering.

Published in:

Quality of Service, 2002. Tenth IEEE International Workshop on

Date of Conference: