Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Dispersion analysis of crack-waves in an artificial subsurface fracture using two crack models

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Nagano, K. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Syst. Eng., Muroran Inst. of Technol., Hokkaido, Japan ; Niitsuma, H.

The authors investigated crack-wave dispersions in an artificial subsurface fracture both experimentally and numerically using a wavelet analysis and two crack models. Crack-waves are seismic modes that propagate along a fracture. The dispersion characteristics of crack-waves depend on the geometry and physical properties of a fracture. The authors measured crack-waves at an artificial subsurface fracture in Higashi-Hachimantai Hot Dry Rock model field, Japan. This subsurface fracture is at a depth of about 370 m. During a measurement, they injected water into the fracture and changed the interface conditions of the fracture. A wavelet analysis provided the dispersion of the arrival times of crack-waves. The crack-waves showed positive velocity dispersion; i.e., low frequency components arrived later. As wellhead pressure increased due to water injection, the dispersion characteristics changed. A low-velocity-layer (LVL) model and a crack-stiffness model were examined to explain crack-wave dispersion. In the LVL model, rock layers with a low velocity surround a fluid layer. There is no contact between the LVLs. On the other hand, the crack-stiffness model considers crack stiffness due to contact between asperities on fracture surfaces. The arrival-time curves calculated by the crack-stiffness model showed a good fit to the measured values. As wellhead pressure increased, crack stiffness decreased and thickness of a fluid layer increased. In contrast, the LVL model did not adequately duplicate the measured data

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:38 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication:

Jan 2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.