Scheduled System Maintenance:
Some services will be unavailable Sunday, March 29th through Monday, March 30th. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Bayesian graph edit distance

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Myers, R. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., York Univ., UK ; Wilson, R.C. ; Hancock, E.R.

This paper describes a novel framework for comparing and matching corrupted relational graphs. The normalised edit distance of Marzal and Vidal (1993) can be used to model the probability distribution for structural errors in the graph-matching problem. This probability distribution is used to locate matches using MAP label updates. We compare this criterion with that recently reported by Wilson and Hancock (1997). The use of edit distance offers an elegant alternative to the exhaustive compilation of label dictionaries. Moreover the method is polynomial rather than exponential in its worst-case complexity. We support our approach with an experimental study on synthetic data, and illustrate its effectiveness on an uncalibrated stereo correspondence problem

Published in:

Image Analysis and Processing, 1999. Proceedings. International Conference on

Date of Conference: