By Topic

Optimal Control of a Mechanical Hybrid Powertrain

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
van Berkel, K. ; Dept. of Mech. Eng., Eindhoven Univ. of Technol., Eindhoven, Netherlands ; Hofman, T. ; Vroemen, B. ; Steinbuch, M.

This paper presents the design of an optimal energy management strategy (EMS) for a low-cost mechanical hybrid powertrain. It uses mechanical components only-a flywheel, clutches, gears, and a continuously variable transmission-for its hybrid functionalities of brake energy recuperation, reduction of inefficient part-load operation of the engine, and engine shutoff during vehicle standstill. This powertrain has mechanical characteristics, such as a relatively small energy storage capacity in the form of the compact flywheel and multiple driving modes to operate the powertrain because of the use of clutches. The optimization problem is complex because it is two fold: 1) to find the optimal sequence of driving modes and 2) to find the optimal power distribution between the engine, the flywheel, and the vehicle. Dynamic programming is used to compute the globally optimal EMS for six representative driving cycles. The main design criterion is the minimization of the overall fuel consumption, subject to the system's kinematics, dynamics, and constraints. The results provide a benchmark of the fuel-saving potential of this powertrain design and give insight into the optimal utilization of the flywheel system. In addition, the complexity (and computation time) of the problem is reduced by a priori (static) optimization of the power distribution for each driving mode. Static optimization of a dynamic optimization problem yields a suboptimal solution; however, the results show that the consequences on the fuel saving are small with respect to the optimal one (the difference is <; 0.8%).

Published in:

Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:61 ,  Issue: 2 )