By Topic

Fast critical sections via thread scheduling for FPGA-based multithreaded processors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Martin Labrecque ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada ; J. Gregory Steffan

As FPGA based systems including soft processors become increasingly common, we are motivated to better understand the architectural trade-offs and improve the efficiency of these systems. Previous work has demonstrated that support for multithreading in soft processors can tolerate pipeline and I/O latencies as well as improve overall system throughput-however earlier work assumes an abundance of completely independent threads to execute. In this work we show that for real workloads, in particular packet processing applications, there is a large fraction of processor cycles wasted while awaiting the synchronization of shared data structures, limiting the benefits of a multithreaded design. We address this challenge by proposing a method of scheduling threads in hardware that allows the multithreaded pipeline to be more fully utilized without significant costs in area or frequency. We evaluate our technique relative to conventional multithreading using both simulation and a real implementation on a NetFPGA board, evaluating three deep-packet inspection applications that are threaded, synchronize, and share data structures, and show that overall packet throughput can be increased by 63%, 31%, and 41% for our three applications.

Published in:

2009 International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications

Date of Conference:

Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 2 2009