By Topic

Speech Enhancement Combining Optimal Smoothing and Errors-In-Variables Identification of Noisy AR Processes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)

In the framework of speech enhancement, several parametric approaches based on an a priori model for a speech signal have been proposed. When using an autoregressive (AR) model, three issues must be addressed. (1) How to deal with AR parameter estimation? Indeed, due to additive noise, the standard least squares criterion leads to biased estimates of AR parameters. (2) Can an estimation of the variance of the additive noise for each speech frame be obtained? A voice activity detector is often used for its estimation. (3) Which estimation rules and techniques (filtering, smoothing, etc.) can be considered to retrieve the speech signal? Our contribution in this paper is threefold. First, we propose to view the identification of the noisy AR process as an errors-in-variables problem. This blind method has the advantage of providing accurate estimations of both the AR parameters and the variance of the additive noise. Second, we propose an alternative algorithm to standard Kalman smoothing, based on a constrained minimum variance estimation procedure with a lower computational cost. Third, the combination of these two steps is investigated. It provides better results than some existing speech enhancement approaches in terms of signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), segmental SNR, and informal subjective tests.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing  (Volume:55 ,  Issue: 12 )